The Procurement Act was passed in December 2014 and partially proclaimed by my Government in July 2015.
The objects of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Property Act 2015 were to promote:
(a) the principles of accountability, integrity, transparency and value for money;
(b) efficiency, fairness, equity and public confidence; and
(c) local industry development, sustainable procurement and sustainable development, in public procurement and the disposal of public property.
For the past 5 years, there has been no attempt by this Government to make any moves to operationalise this legislation. After repeated calls by the Opposition and civil society, this Government has failed to fully proclaim the legislation.
They intend to amend the legislation a third time on Friday. The government will move an amendment to the Procurement Act to extract the teeth out of the legislation, leaving it without any bite at curbing corruption.
This is the third attempt by this PNM Government to water-down the Procurement Legislation. The Government again misses an opportunity to bring to the Parliament the necessary Regulations required to operationalise the Act.
The Government intends to amend section 7 of the Procurement Act to remove from the scrutiny of the Act, the following services: legal, financial, accounting and auditing, medical services and any other service as the Minister may by Order determine, by negative resolution.
This PNM government now wants to remove these services and transactions from scrutiny not just of the Regulator, but of Parliament as well. What makes this more distasteful and unethical is that we passed this Act in 2014 with a special majority and this Government now proposes to defeat the very object and purpose of this Act by a simple majority vote.
I call on the Government to explain the reason for removing these services from being subject to the Procurement Act. The Minister must answer why legal services and medical services are exempt from the Act. Is it because there is a Minister of Government with an interest in a medical company?
Is the exemption for the provision of financial services as a result of a Minister of Government’s close ties to a relative that provides financial services to the Government?
The Prime Minister as Chairman of the Cabinet must explain the reason for this amendment.
The Procurement Regulator and his team have not yet been given a chance to oversee the procurement practices and disposal of public property, and they have already been rendered impotent by this Government’s proposed amendments.
The UNC oppose this boldfaced tactic by the Rowley regime to demoralise and destabilise our independent institutions and our very democracy.